Haley Kalil appears to be shaking off the drama amid her lawsuit with ex-husband Matt Kalil.
Haley, 33, took to Instagram on Friday, January 9, to share a video of herself dancing to Taylor Swift’s “Shake It Off.” The influencer wore a black skintight dress and kept a smile on her face as she lip-synched to the chorus of the throwback hit.
“It’s gonna be alright / ‘Cause the players gonna play, play, play, play, play / And the haters gonna hate, hate, hate, hate, hate / Baby, I’m just gonna shake, shake, shake, shake, shake / I shake it off, I shake it off,” she sang.
In the caption, Haley simply added a pink heart emoji.
Haley Kalil Will Try to Dismiss Matt Kalil’s Lawsuit: Divorce Drama Explained
The video comes days after Matt, 36, filed a lawsuit against his ex-wife for publicly discussing the size of his penis during a November 2025 Twitch livestream. The former Minnesota Vikings player alleged that Haley provided “invasive commentary” and drew “unwanted attention” to him. He is seeking to receive upwards of $75,000 in damages, according to court documents obtained by NewsPlop on Wednesday, January 7.
Haley claimed during the livestream that the size of Matt’s manhood was the “biggest factor” in their 2022 divorce.
“[This happened] our whole marriage,” she said at the time. “I was going to try it all — therapists, doctors [and I] looked up lipo-type s***, you know what I mean? That’s why it’s kinda funny. It’s like my life is a comedy, and it kind of writes itself. It was like, he’s .01 percent of the population. We tried everything [and it was] impossible unless you’re going to be in tears.”
After Haley’s comments went viral, she issued a statement about Matt’s privacy.
“I care deeply about respecting his privacy and the integrity of what we shared together. During our livestream we talked about so much more than what’s being highlighted — the love in our marriage, the growth we experienced, the depth of our connection,” she told TMZ Sports in November 2025. “It’s unfortunate that only one fragment is being amplified because it doesn’t capture the full story of how meaningful things were to me. I hope [the] hour-and-half-long conversation reflects more than a funny soundbite.”
Matt claimed in his Tuesday, January 6, filing that Haley’s livestream comments forced him to “endure the ongoing public circulation of these degrading and deeply personal statements.” He also alleged that she was able to “financially benefit from this surge in traffic.”
Haley told Us in a statement that she was “genuinely shocked and incredibly hurt” by the lawsuit.
“Litigation is a harrowing and emotionally draining experience, and I am heartbroken that he is choosing to subject us and our families to this ordeal,” the statement read, adding that Haley also called Matt “the greatest guy in the world” during the livestream despite her other complaints.
“The truth is in the original livestream. I speak highly of him in multiple ways throughout that conversation,” the statement concluded.
Haley’s lawyer Matthew Bialick said the TikToker will fight back against Matt’s lawsuit in a statement to People on Wednesday, January 7, saying the “case is legally unsupported” and that they would file a motion to dismiss.
Every Time an NFL Significant Other Clapped Back at Fans
“The claims seek to dramatically expand existing law and establish damaging new precedent by imposing liability on a woman for merely speaking openly and truthfully about a prior relationship,” Bialick told the outlet. “That raises serious First Amendment concerns, especially in a case involving two public figures.”
Matt’s attorney Ryan Saba argued in a statement to Us that Haley “disclosed private and intimate details about Matt Kalil that were of no legitimate public concern and subjected Matt Kalil and his family to widespread ridicule and unwanted attention.”
The statement continued, “[Haley] Kalil shared these sensitive personal details about her ex-husband in an apparent quest to seek fortune and fame. Her actions were extreme, outrageous, beyond all possible bounds of decency, and have caused substantial harm to Matt Kalil, his family and his business.”
In a separate statement to Us, Haley’s attorney said, “The lawsuit alleges that Ms. Kalil claimed that sexual intercourse with Mr. Kalil would leave her ‘in tears.’ Allowing this allegation to form the basis of a legal claim would mean that a woman could be sued merely for truthfully describing physical pain during sex, which is not consistent with the First Amendment.”